<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI on emptyname</title><link>https://emptyname.org/tags/ai/</link><description>Recent content in AI on emptyname</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://emptyname.org/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When Machines Make Better Art</title><link>https://emptyname.org/when-machines-make-better-art/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://emptyname.org/when-machines-make-better-art/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Notes on the return of art to its original function&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4 id="i"&gt;I.&lt;a class="hanchor" href="#i" aria-label="Link to this section"&gt;§&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The premise no longer takes much daring: machines will come to make better art than humans - more skilled, more inventive, more conceptually agile, endlessly, and for nothing. A persona, sometimes offered as a consolation, comes apart under scrutiny: as an intellectual construct - a voice, a biography-shaped narrative, a style signature - it can be run by a machine more steadily than a person could ever sustain their own. The skill is long gone. The novelty is going, and the recognition and the money might follow. What remains is not a faculty artists have and machines lack. It's stranger than that, something the artists have been standing on the whole time without looking down.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>